Drawing for I.INFORMIX

USPTO serial 75616797

I.INFORMIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I.INFORMIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allyn Taylor

ALLYN TAYLOR GRAY CARY WARE & PREIDENRICH LLP400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1825UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS, NAMELY, DATABASE ENGINES, DEVELOPMENT TOOLS, AND APPLICATIONS THAT PROVIDE SOLUTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC COMMERCE OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, AND OVER A CORPORATE COMPUTER INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, FOR GENERAL USEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Mar 21, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance