USPTO serial 75617190
CABLE@RETAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CABLE@RETAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Durlacher
JAMES M DURLACHER WOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON ET ALBANK ONE CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5194Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cable modems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMSON MULTIMEDIA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CABLE@RETAIL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |