Drawing for CYBERSTAFFING

USPTO serial 75617323

CYBERSTAFFING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERSTAFFING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLIE J. LOTT

LESLIE J LOTT P O DRAWER 141098LOTT & FRIEDLAND, PACORAL GABLES, FL 33114-1098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employment and career development services, namely personnel recruitment, training and placement; payroll and accounting services; and telecommunications services, namely telemarketing, telephone and electronic call center services and telephone answering servicesACTIVESep 29, 1998
041Educational services and training, namely conducting classes, workshops and seminars in person, by videotape and broadcast and by electronic means in the field of telecommunications services, namely telemarketing, telephone answering services, and telephone and electronic call center services, customer services, computer operation and data processingACTIVESep 29, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance