Drawing for HAYS

USPTO serial 75617369

HAYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Strauss

STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039TRANSPORT AND DELIVERY OF GOODS AND MATERIALS BY ROAD AND BY WATER; ARRANGING THE TRANSPORT OF GOODS AND MATERIALS BY LAND, WATER AND BY AIR; CHARTERING OF VEHICLES, NAMELY, TRUCKS AND CHARTERING BOATS; CARGO CONTAINER RENTAL SERVICES; CARGO HANDLING SERVICES; CRATING OF GOODS; WAREHOUSING OF GOODS AND OF MATERIALS; WHARFAGE SERVICES; TUGBOAT SERVICES; TRANSPORTATION BY TRUCK AND STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS, PRINTED MATTER, COMPUTER TAPES, COMPUTER DISCS, LETTERS AND PARCELS; ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF COMPUTER DISCS AND MESSAGES; COLLECTION AND DELIVERY OF PARCELS AND OF DOCUMENTS BY TRUCK; FREIGHT FORWARDING SERVICES; CARGO LOADING AND UNLOADING; AND SHIP BROKERAGE SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 24, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 24, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 1, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 18, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance