USPTO serial 75617592
A WIRED WORLD COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A WIRED WORLD COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLCSTE 34001111 THIRD AVESEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail store services, electronic retailing services via a global computer network, distributorships, and catalog and mail order services, all featuring text books, software, pre-recorded audio/video cassettes and tapes, compact discs and CD-ROMs, appliances, consumer electronics, computers and computer peripherals, cellular phones, pagers, satellite dishes, stereo systems, cd players, housewares, garden items, tools, baby care and safety products, baby furniture, clothing, sport and tote bags, umbrellas, jewelry, musical instruments, toys, games, game accessories and game equipment, costumes, masks, sports and athletic equipment, and general giftware items, including postcards and calendars, note cards, greeting cards, stationery, posters, appointment books, and diaries; electronic billboard advertising; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network; advertising agency services, namely promoting the goods and services of software and hardware companies, ISPs, e-commerce and on-line businesses in a wide range of industries, software and hardware developers, web page designers, wireless communications companies, and cellular phone companies through the distribution of printed, audio, visual and on-line promotional materials and by rendering sales promotion advise; preparing advertisements for others; agencies for advertising time and space; promoting sporting events, exhibitions, trade shows, conventions, concerts, and other forms of public entertainment of others; providing facilities for trade shows; and providing interactive computer databases and on-line information services via a global computer network, wide area networks and local area networks in the fields of business, accounting, management, sales, marketing, leadership and personal growth | ACTIVE | May 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vulcan Northwest
- Other trademarks owned by Vulcan Northwest
- Other trademarks owned by VULCAN INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named A WIRED WORLD COMPANY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |