USPTO serial 75617638
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLCSTE 34001111 THIRD AVESEATTLE, WA 98101| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newsletters, brochures, and instructional manuals, all in the field of education, sports, music, music history, dance, popular culture, theater, drama, performing arts, film, television, visual arts, art history, business, accounting, management, sales and marketing, finance, computers, computer software, information technology, communication, leadership, personal growth, and emerging technologies; posters, printed tickets, voucher books, stickers and decals | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |