Drawing for WHOLE FOODS

USPTO serial 75617689

WHOLE FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHOLE FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher L. Graff

CHRISTOPHER L GRAFF THOMSON & KNIGHT LLP98 SAN JACINTO BLVD1200 SAN JACINTO CTRAUSTIN, TX 78701-4081

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed olives, processed tomatoes, processed peppers, processed beans, processed nuts, raisins, nut butters, jams, processed fruits, edible oil, vegetable bread spreads, smoked salmon, tofuACTIVE—
030Rolled oats, pasta, polenta cooked or dry cornmeal, ravioli, crackers, cookies, cheese-flavored corn chips, tortilla chips, pretzels, salad dressing, mayonnaise, mustard, vinegar, spices, processed herbs, honey, maple syrup, chocolate, coffee, ice tea, pasta sauce, chocolate sauce, caramel sauce, barbecue sauce, salsas, hot sauces, stuffing mixes containing bread, tortillas and processed popcornACTIVE—
031Unprocessed popcornACTIVE—
032Fresh fruit juices, sweet ciderACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 6, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 17, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 26, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 5, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 17, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance