USPTO serial 75617689
WHOLE FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHOLE FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L. Graff
CHRISTOPHER L GRAFF THOMSON & KNIGHT LLP98 SAN JACINTO BLVD1200 SAN JACINTO CTRAUSTIN, TX 78701-4081Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed olives, processed tomatoes, processed peppers, processed beans, processed nuts, raisins, nut butters, jams, processed fruits, edible oil, vegetable bread spreads, smoked salmon, tofu | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Rolled oats, pasta, polenta cooked or dry cornmeal, ravioli, crackers, cookies, cheese-flavored corn chips, tortilla chips, pretzels, salad dressing, mayonnaise, mustard, vinegar, spices, processed herbs, honey, maple syrup, chocolate, coffee, ice tea, pasta sauce, chocolate sauce, caramel sauce, barbecue sauce, salsas, hot sauces, stuffing mixes containing bread, tortillas and processed popcorn | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed popcorn | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fresh fruit juices, sweet cider | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |