USPTO serial 75618097
TAVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIM M. ARGO
KIM M ARGO ABRAHAMS KASLOW & CASSMAN8712 W DODGE RD STE 300OMAHA, NE 68114-3419UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services; namely analysis of current and future automation needs including, but not limited to, plant assessments and support services, namely, troubleshooting of problems via telephone, e-mail and in person in connection with industry engineering and processes, namely, the manufacturing, aerospace, automotive, chemical, discrete manufacturing, food and beverage, forest products, microelectronics and semiconductors, mining petrochemical, pharmaceutical and biotech, power generation, and water/wastewater industries | ACTIVE | Nov 4, 1996 |
| 042 | Computer consulting services; namely global independent systems integration including, but not limited to , year 2000 compliance analysis; software and hardware design, design for others; installation and startup of computer software for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail and in person in connection with industry engineering and processes, namely, the manufacturing, aerospace, automotive, chemical, discrete manufacturing, food and beverage, forest products, microelectronics and semiconductors, mining, petrochemical, pharmaceutical and biotech, power generation, and water/wastewater industries | ACTIVE | Nov 4, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |