USPTO serial 75618100
VIDEOLOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2557628Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2002
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIDEOLOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hertfordshire WD4 8LZ, GB
Hertfordshire WD4 8LZ, GB
Hertfordshire WD4 8LZ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane B. Melnick
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and electronic apparatus, namely, personal computers, video game consoles, hi-fi speakers, electronic game set-top boxes, and joy sticks, and semiconductors, all for use in multimedia applications; interactive video apparatus, namely, interactive web video cameras and personal computer video cameras; software for video conferencing via a global computer network, video capture and editing, video e-mail, video postcards, freeze-frames of video images, and interface software for all of the foregoing; computer software, firmware and computer program used for the production and transmission of audio, graphic, video capture and video conferencing functions, for use in connection with DVD and USB cameras; digital video adapters and interactive video adaptors, for use with computers and video apparatus for displaying text with video pictures; computer, electronic and electrical hardware, namely, semiconductors and integrated circuits for use with multimedia, entertainment and digital systems, namely, personal computers, video game consoles, arcade systems, hi-fi systems and set-top boxes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |