USPTO serial 75618643
BANKATLANTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3566252Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2009
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BANKATLANTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Schwartz
Robert M. Schwartz ROBERT M. SCHWARTZ, P.A.P.O. Box 221470Hollywood, FL 33022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 14, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named BANKATLANTIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |