USPTO serial 75619450
SHARED VIRTUAL ARRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2687709Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2003
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHARED VIRTUAL ARRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Storage Technology Corporation
Louisville, CO
Storage Technology Corporation
Louisville, CO
Storage Technology Corporation
Louisville, CO
SANTA CLARA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR DATA STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL, AND MANUALS, PROVIDED AS A UNIT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Storage Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Storage Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Storage Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SHARED VIRTUAL ARRAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |