Drawing for MODISPRO.COM

USPTO serial 75619610

MODISPRO.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODISPRO.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS C. SAITTA

THOMAS C SAITTA1301 RIVERPLACE BLVD STE 1500JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035EMPLOYMENT STAFFING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, BUSINESS PROCESS RE-ENGINEERING AND STRATEGIC ANALYSISACTIVE—
042TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NAMELY, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING, AND MAINTAINING COMPUTER SOFTWARE, PROVIDING PROJECT MANAGEMENT, PROVIDING INTEGRATION AND ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS, AND PROVIDING WEB DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL AND IN PERSON; DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND LOCAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL WRITING FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 22, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 10, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance