USPTO serial 75619726
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Johnson
JOHN M JOHNSON LYON & LYON, LLP633 W FIFTH STSTE 4700LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-1600| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation and management services for the marketing and communications industries, namely, business referral, consultation and information processing support services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2002 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |