Drawing for FISH & CHIPS

USPTO serial 75620162

FISH & CHIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FISH & CHIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY L FLETCHER

ANTHONY L FLETCHER FISH & RICHARDSON PC45 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 2800NEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Biomedical consultation, analysis, research, testing and laboratory services, namely, the identification of nucleic acids for use in detecting particular expression of genes in animal cellsACTIVEAug 17, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 22, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 9, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 21, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 15, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 6, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 19, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 28, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 13, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance