USPTO serial 75620339
VIBRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2629627Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIBRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HAIFA, IL
HAIFA, IL
HAIFA, IL
Matam, Haifa 31905, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathaniel Buchek
NATHANIEL BUCHEK PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER10 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 1001NEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE; MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICES, NAMELY, JOYSTICKS THAT RECREATE DIFFERENT PHYSICAL SENSATIONS; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT RECREATES VARIOUS PHYSICAL SENSATIONS, NAMELY, FORCE FEED BACK, FOR USE IN VIRTUAL REALITY, ENTERTAINMENT, RELAXATION, EXERCISE AND HEALTH CARE APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INVIBRO TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by INVIBRO TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by INVIBRO TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by InMotion Technologies Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VIBRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |