USPTO serial 75620930
"TO DIE FOR!"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 29, 2002
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with "TO DIE FOR!"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MAYNARD, MA
Concord, MA
Concord, MA
Concord, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Lund
Scott A. Lund Dicke, Billig & Czaja, PLLC100 South Fifth Street, Suite 2250Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dips and cheese-based, fruit-based, meat-based and vegetable-based spreads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SEASONAL FOOD BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hammill, Margaret W.
- Other trademarks owned by Hammill, Margaret W.
- Other trademarks owned by Hammill, Margaret W.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named "TO DIE FOR!"
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |