USPTO serial 75620952
CERIDIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CERIDIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDGAR A ZARINS
MICHAEL D FISHMAN39533 WOODWARD AVESTE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | NON-METALLIC MATERIAL IN THE NATURE OF MOLDED PLASTICS AND FIBERGLASS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF BATHING AND PLUMBING FIXTURES, NAMELY, TUBS, SINKS, SHOWER ENCLOSURES, AND COUNTERTOPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |