USPTO serial 75621038
ETAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ETAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TELE ATLAS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
MENLO PARK, CA
MENLO PARK, CA
MENLO PARK, CA
TELE ATLAS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
MENLO PARK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R Haarz
David R Haarz Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC11730 Plaza America DrSuite 600Reston, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR PERSONAL NAVIGATION AND MAP DISPLAYS, TRAFFIC INFORMATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC AND DIGITAL MAP; SUITE OF DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE FOR MAPPING, PATHFINDING AND NAVIGATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE ATLAS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ETAK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ETAK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TELE ATLAS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ETAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |