Drawing for LIVING AUCTIONS

USPTO serial 75621142

LIVING AUCTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, LAURIEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVING AUCTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA M TITTEMORE

LISA M TITTEMORE BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN125 SUMMER ST STE 1100BOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in communications networks, namely, computer software for accessing computer networks; computer software for facilitating the sale of goods by others via a computer network; computer software for use in on-line auctions, namely, computer software for providing evaluative feedback and ratings of sellers' goods and services, the value and prices of sellers' goods, buyers' and sellers' performance, delivery, and overall trading experience, for placing bids, for tracking bids, and for alerting auction winners; and, computer software using software agents for the automation of online trading, bidding and auctionsACTIVE—
042COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND FOR THE PROCESSING OF BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS, NAMELY, PURCHASING AND SELLING PRODUCTS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, SALES AUCTIONS, BUYING AUCTIONS, AND AUTOMATION OF COURSES OF BUSINESS THROUGH A SOFTWARE AGENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 19, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 1999AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance