Drawing for Serial No. 75621270

USPTO serial 75621270

Serial No. 75621270

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75621270?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORM D. LANDAU

NORM D LANDAU DRINKER, BIDDLE & REATH, LLP1500 K ST N W STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGSACTIVE—
016PUBLICATIONS-NAMELY, BROCHURES IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION, SPEECH AND PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS, AND TECHNOLOGY TO ASSIST CHILDREN WITH SPEECH AND PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, SWEATSHIRTS AND HATSACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES RENDERED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH SEVERE SPEECH AND PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS, NAMELY, OPERATING A SCHOOL AND DISSEMINATING INFORMATION ON THE TECHNOLOGIES FOR EDUCATING THE PHYSICALLY AND SPEECH IMPAIREDACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 21, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 20, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 8, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 31, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 15, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance