USPTO serial 75621298
ILINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ILINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel Fifer
SAMUEL FIFER WACKER DRIVESONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL8000 SEARS TWR 233 SCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, the international electronic transmission of voice and facsimile data over data lines using the global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |