USPTO serial 75621533
SPINALIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPINALIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bloomington, MN
Bloomington, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy A. Czaja
TIMOTHY A CZAJA DICKE BILLIG & CZAJA PLLCSTE 2250100 S FIFTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Hydrogel-based implantable prosthetic spinal disc nucleus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |