USPTO serial 75622791
ELITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R.Young
JAMES R YOUNG CHRISMAN BVNUM & JOHNSON PC1900 15TH STBOULDER, CO 80302-5414UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical vascular equipment, namely, vascular and fetal heart doppler monitoring devices consisting of battery powered receiver/amplifier unit with sound transmitter and user-detachable, hand-held probes with ultra-sound transmitters and receivers for use on human beings and animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |