Drawing for NORDICWALKER

USPTO serial 75622840

NORDICWALKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORDICWALKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E Burpee

CHARLES E BURPEE WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PRACTICE GP900 OLD KENT BLDG 111 LYON ST NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2489

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028EXERCISE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY HAND-HELD POLES USED TO ENHANCE THE EXERCISE BENEFITS OF WALKING OR RUNNINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 15, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 8, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance