USPTO serial 75623523
RELIANT ENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RELIANT ENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R ROBINSON
JAMES R ROBINSON BAKER BOTTS LLPONE SHELL PLZ910 LOUISIANA ST STE 3000HOUSTON, TX 77002-4995Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Energy facilities and infrastructure, namely, energy generation plants, plants that produce chilled water and steam, ice generation plants, natural gas gathering systems comprising gathering lines, compressor stations and gas processing facilities; transmission and storage facilities and equipment, namely, pipelines, compressor stations, storage wells, caverns and tanks, gate stations, regulators, converter stations and transformers; hot water heaters; space conditioning units | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Reliant Energy, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named RELIANT ENERGY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |