USPTO serial 75624099
BEACON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEACON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI ROONEY & SIVERTSON PA3433 BROADWAY ST NE STE 401MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413-1740UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Business and consumer banking services | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 26, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |