USPTO serial 75624303
ETIMECARD.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2001
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ETIMECARD.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clyde A. Szuch
CLYDE A SZUCH PITNEY, HARDIN, KIPP & SZUCH200 CAMPUS DRFLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK BY PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS AND PROMOTIONAL DISPLAYS ON ELECTRONIC WEBSITES; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PROVIDING A DIRECTORY AND REFERRAL WEBSITE AT WHICH USERS CAN LINK TO OTHER VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2000 |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR GATHERING TIME, ATTENDANCE, CLIENT BILLING, PROJECT COSTING AND EXPENSE ACCOUNTING INFORMATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |