USPTO serial 75624913
CARDIAC HEALTHWAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARDIAC HEALTHWAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea C. Barach
ANDREA C BARACHP O BOX 198062NASHVILLE, TN 37219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGING COST AND PATIENT OUTCOMES FOR HOSPITALS AND HEALTH PLANS THROUGH DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO BE ADMINISTERED (1) BY HOSPITALS STAFFS FOR THEIR PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC DISEASE, AND (2) FOR MEMBERS OF HEALTH PLANS WHO HAVE BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH CARDIAC DISEASE, WHICH PROGRAMS ARE DESIGNED TO GENERATE SHORT AND LONG TERM SAVINGS OF HEALTH CARE COSTS AS WELL AS IMPROVED PATIENT OUTCOMES | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |