USPTO serial 75624964
FRUTAFFY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRUTAFFY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edo. de Mexico, C.P. 54730, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN C/O ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Spices and seasonings; bread; processed foods made from cereals, namely, noodles, dried rice, spaghetti, buckwheat noodles, macaroni, rice cakes; confectionery, namely, rice crackers, steamed cakes, bean jam cakes, beanjam-filled wafers, ice cream, castella, candy, cookies, cream puffs, sponge cakes, chocolate, doughnuts, pies, biscuits, pancakes and waffles, chewing gum; sandwiches, sushi, hamburgers, pizzas and hot dogs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |