USPTO serial 75624985
HITACHI VIA MECHANICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3125260Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2006
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HITACHI VIA MECHANICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
David Ehrlich Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Stand alone laser direct imaging machines for use in imaging and innerlayers and flex panels of printed circuit boards; digitizers, namely electronic digital writing and drawing pads | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HITACHI VIA MECHANICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2014 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |