USPTO serial 75624995
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa F. Peller
LISA F PELLER FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NETWORK ACCESS EQUIPMENT AND PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, CONCENTRATORS, BRIDGES, HUBS, ROUTERS, COMMUNICATION AND CALL SERVERS, TRANSMITTERS, TRANSCEIVERS, RECEIVERS, REPEATERS, MULTIPLEXORS, GATEWAYS, ETHERNET PC CARDS; AND FIBRE OPTIC TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT FOR BROAD CONNECTIVITY USING PHOTONIC WAVE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING, NAMELY, OPTICAL NETWORK INTERFACES, PROGRAMMABLE TRANSPORT TERMINALS, CROSS CONNECT APPARATUS AND FIBER OPTICAL DATA LINKS; SWITCHES; NETWORK OPERATIONS; AND MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, INTERNET APPLIANCES, NAMELY, FIREWALLS AND EQUIPMENT FOR CACHING, LOAD BALANCING AND TRAFFIC MANAGING; INTERNET TELEPHONY DEVICES, NAMELY, NETWORK MANAGERS AND CONTROLLERS; SOFTWARE TO OPERATE ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS; SOFTWARE THAT PROVIDES CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES OVER THE INTERNET, NAMELY, ONE-STOP SHOPPING FOR HIGH CAPACITY INTERNET ACCESS, COMPETITIVE LOCAL VOICE LINES, LONG-DISTANCE AND TOLL-FREE VOICE LINES, ACCELERATING DEVELOPMENT OF REVENUE-GENERATING E-COMMERCE SERVICES, CUSTOMIZATION OF NEW E-COMMERCE SERVICES, EXPANDING THE COMMUNITY OF PROSPECTIVE SERVICE DEVELOPERS, PROVIDING GREATER SERVICE PROVIDER CONTROL OF TIME-TO-MARKET FOR NEW SERVICES IN A JAVA-BASED SERVICE DEPLOYMENT AND EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT; PLATFORMS, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NETWORK APPLICATIONS FOR E-COMMERCE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2002 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |