USPTO serial 75625145
CELLECTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLECTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S HARPER
DAVID S HARPER HULBERT & BERGHOFF300 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Reagents for use in conducting cell-based analysis by light optical methods for scientific and medical research use; kits containing reagents for use in conducting cell-based analysis by light optical methods for scientific and medical research use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer software for use in conducting cell-based analysis and screening by light optical methods; computer instrumentation, namely, controllers for driving scanning hardware for use in conducting cell-based analysis by light optical methods; screening systems, namely, optical components for use in conducting cell-based analysis by light optical methods, namely. light microscope optics, optical detectors, filter wheels and slider, shutters and diaphragms, motorized mounts, arc lamps, and CCD cameras; screening systems, namely, laboratory equipment, namely, fluid handling chambers and environmental control chambers for use in conducting cell-based analysis by light optical methods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others and scientific research in the field of cell-based analysis by light optical methods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS JENA GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CELLECTIVE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |