USPTO serial 75625646
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Reisterstown, MD
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | plastic buckle fasteners for use in child strollers, high chairs, child carriers, changing stations, shopping cart restraint systems, and similar articles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |