Drawing for SAFE-T-BUCKLE

USPTO serial 75625646

SAFE-T-BUCKLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, MARGARET
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFE-T-BUCKLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020plastic buckle fasteners for use in child strollers, high chairs, child carriers, changing stations, shopping cart restraint systems, and similar articlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2001PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Nov 6, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 16, 2000PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 21, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 8, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance