USPTO serial 75625710
DURECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2659859Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 2002
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DURECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARGARET M. POWERS
MARGARET M. POWERS SHAY GLENN, LLP2755 Campus Drive, Ste. 210San Mateo, CA 94403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PRESCRIPTION PHARMACEUTICALS, NAMELY, PHARMACEUTICALS PRESCRIBED BY PHYSICIANS AND DELIVERED BY MEANS OF IMPLANTABLE DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC DISEASES OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, [ CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE, OCCLUSIONS OF BLOOD VESSELS AND GRAFTS, ] [ EAR DISORDERS, ] [ CANCER, SPASTICITY, FAILED ] BACK PAIN, [ SPINAL CORD INJURIES, ] [ NEURO-DEGENERATIVE DISEASES, ] AND CHRONIC PAIN; AND DRUG DELIVERY DEVICES CONTAINING MEDICATIONS, NAMELY, IMPLANTABLE DEVICES FOR DELIVERY OF DRUGS BY IMPLANTATION AND RELEASE OF MEDICATIONS IN THE HUMAN BODY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 26, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |