USPTO serial 75625898
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Meyers
STEPHEN J MEYERSSTE 1800TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Janitorial chemicals and cleaning products, namely, all purpose cleaning preparations; cleaning preparations for windows; cleaning preparations for ovens and grills; cleaning preparations for the removal of graffiti; cleaning and polishing preparations for formica; stainless steel polish; descalers; oven cleaners; all purpose cleaning a degreasing preparations; dishwashing detergents; laundry detergents; furniture polish; floor polish; wax stripping preparations; carpet cleaning preparations; carpet stain removers and pre-spotters; spot removers; tile and grout cleaners; silicone furniture and floor polish, liquid hand soaps; and toilet bowl cleaners | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2001 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |