Drawing for STRATAPAC

USPTO serial 75626087

STRATAPAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRATAPAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda Pickering, Esq.

LINDA PICKERING TRADEMARK COUNSEL CRYOVAC INCPARK 80 ESADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663-5291UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Plastic, paper and cardboard materials for packaging, namely bags, envelopes, pouches, boxes, sheet form for wrapping and packaging with or without printed matter, plastic or paper bags for merchandise packaging, namely plastic packs with entrapped pockets of air and blister cards for wrapping or packaging, internally padded or lined plastic or paper bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 1, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 14, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance