USPTO serial 75626184
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SANTA CLARA, CA
Raleigh, NC
Raleigh, NC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY A. DONOVAN
MARY A DONOVAN DONOVAN & YEE, LLP110 GREENE ST STE 700NEW YORK, NY 10012UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | plastic or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) overlay or casing for personal digital assistants, and mobile, handheld or palm-top computers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |