Drawing for Serial No. 75626354

USPTO serial 75626354

Serial No. 75626354

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75626354?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM S. FROMMER

WILLIAM S FROMMER FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036REAL ESTATE AGENCY SERVICES, LEASING OFFICE SPACE TO TENANTS, MANAGEMENT OF REAL ESTATE, REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, AND REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE SERVICESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVISION OF BACKGROUND, BACKDROPS AND VISUAL SETTINGS FOR MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION BROADCASTS, AND VIDEO AND SOUND RECORDINGSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 22, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 22, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 19, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 1, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 3, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance