USPTO serial 75626475
HUE MONO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUE MONO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR, HEADWEAR, AND CLOTHING, NAMELY, JOGGING SUITS, SKIRTS, SWEATERS, SWEAT PANTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, BASE BALL CAPS, KNIT HATS, HATS, SHORTS SETS, TEE SHIRTS, JEANS, COATS, WRIST BANDS, SHIRTS, JERSEYS, HEADBANDS, SOCKS, BOOTS, SUN VISORS, COLLARD SHIRTS, SHOES, ATHLETIC FOOT WEAR, PANTS, RAIN WEAR, JACKETS, APRONS, SKISUIT, BELTS, CARDIGANS, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, SUITS, SLEEP WEAR, SLIPPERS, SNEAKERS, SANDALS, SHORTS, PLAYSUITS, NECK BANDS, LATHER JACKETS, BOOTIES, BOXERS, SCARVES, KNIT SHORTS, BRIEFS, EAR MUFFS, PAJAMAS, NIGHT GOWNS, DRESS SHIRTS, GLOVES, NECK TIES, SWIM WEAR, DRESS SHIRTS, MITTENS, FUR COATS, TUXEDOS, BLOUSES, SPORT BRA, BRA, VESTS, DRESSES, BIKINIS, BLAZERS, BATHROBES, SLACKS, SUSPENDERS, OVERALLS, POLO SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, JEANS SHORTS, RUGBY SHIRTS | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |