USPTO serial 75626511
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theresa W. Middlebrook
GEORGE M FLINT OARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER201 S MAIN ST STE 1800SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-2218UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ELECTRONIC SERVICES, NAMELY, ORDER AND PAYMENT PROCESSING IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRONIC PROCESSING, AND MONITORING AND REPORTING FOR AN TO OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF COMMERCE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR THE TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION IN A WIDE VARIETY OF FIELDS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | CREATING, MAINTAINING, DESIGNING, HOSTING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |