USPTO serial 75627297
PWC PYRAMID WORLDWIDE CORP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PWC PYRAMID WORLDWIDE CORP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James P. Hanrath P.C.
JAMES P HANRATH MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG191 N WACKER DR STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting and computer programming services in the fields of business systems, implementation, and support; batch systems and upgrade; computer hardware and software applications; database applications; technical infrastructure, networking, and workstation set up and application servers; creating, maintaining, and querying data residing in computer files and databases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |