USPTO serial 75627417
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Nakatani, Hector Andre Barrios
Deleg. Iztacalco, D.F. C.P. 08500, MX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H ALSPAUGH
JOHN H ALSPAUGH SELTZER CAPLAN WILKINS & MCMAHON PC2100 SYMPHONY TOWERS 750 B STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Potato chips ; guacamole and guacamole flavored products, namely, guacamole flavored tortilla chips, wheat flour chips, and rice flour chips; peanuts and other types of nut snack products, namely roasted, fried and seasoned nuts and peanuts, in different flavors, and wheat flour covered peanuts and rice flour covered peanuts, each available in roasted, fried, and seasoned varieties, in different flavors | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | pretzels, crackers, and tortilla chips,and wheat flour chips and rice flour chips, in different shapes and flavors the foregoing products are available in a variety of flavors, including lemon flavor, lemon and salt flavor, red pepper and lime flavor, spicy flavor, soy flavor, spicy soy flavor, onion and cream flavor, nacho flavor, bleu cheese flavor, caramel flavor, butter flavor, and honey mustard flavor | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |