USPTO serial 75627549
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER M. EICHLER
PETER M EICHLER2029 CENTURY PARK E 24TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | a series of video tapes featuring health, medical and lifestyle information | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 1999 |
| 038 | providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning health and medicine | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing on-line course instructions in the fields of health and medicine through education photographic, videographic and audiovideogaphic information transmitted via wide area computer networks | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 1999 |
| 042 | entertainment services, namely providing digitized entertainment in the fields of health and medicine through photographic, videographic and audiographic information transmitted via wide area computer networks, Computer services, namely providing on-line information in the fields of health and medicine | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |