Drawing for EENADU

USPTO serial 75627587

EENADU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EENADU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Pickles; Chutneys, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jams and jellies; fruit paste; anchovy paste; artichoke paste; tomato paste; ginger paste; garlic paste; mixes vegetable paste, carrot paste, goose berry paste, mixed fruit paste; guave paste; mango paste; fruit and vegetable pasteACTIVEMay 3, 1999
030Chutneys and sauces; spices, namely spice powders like turmeric chili, garlic, ginger, black pepper, coriander, mixed spice powders (curry powders), vegetable and fruit pulp and powders, preparations made from cereals, flour, grains namely rice, moong, red gram, bengal gram, wheat, barley and corn and alimentary pasteACTIVEMay 3, 1999
032Fruit drink and fruit juices, vegetable drink and vegetable juices, fruit and vegetable concentrates, pulp and mixed fruit and vegetable drink and juicesACTIVEMay 3, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 1999IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 1999IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Jun 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance