USPTO serial 75627587
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Pickles; Chutneys, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jams and jellies; fruit paste; anchovy paste; artichoke paste; tomato paste; ginger paste; garlic paste; mixes vegetable paste, carrot paste, goose berry paste, mixed fruit paste; guave paste; mango paste; fruit and vegetable paste | ACTIVE | May 3, 1999 |
| 030 | Chutneys and sauces; spices, namely spice powders like turmeric chili, garlic, ginger, black pepper, coriander, mixed spice powders (curry powders), vegetable and fruit pulp and powders, preparations made from cereals, flour, grains namely rice, moong, red gram, bengal gram, wheat, barley and corn and alimentary paste | ACTIVE | May 3, 1999 |
| 032 | Fruit drink and fruit juices, vegetable drink and vegetable juices, fruit and vegetable concentrates, pulp and mixed fruit and vegetable drink and juices | ACTIVE | May 3, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |