USPTO serial 75627686
INTEGRATED ELEVATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTEGRATED ELEVATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary B. Schmidt
GARY B SCHMIDT SWEENEY, LEV & BLINKOFF, LLP708 THRID AVE 14TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINERY, NAMELY, ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS; MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, BEARINGS AND BUSHINGS, BELTS FOR MOTORS AND ENGINES, BRAKE LININGS FOR MACHINES, BRAKES FOR MACHINES, CLUTCHES FOR MACHINES, AND CONNECTING RODS FOR MACHINES; TORQUE CONVERTERS, NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES; DIESEL ENGINES NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES; CONVEYOR BELTS MADE OF WIRE; CONVEYORS; COUPLINGS FOR MACHINES; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; POWER-OPERATED LIFTS FOR MOVING, PARKING AND STORING LAND VEHICLES; POWER TRANSMISSION BELTS FOR MACHINES; AND WHEELS BEING PART OF MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrtated Elevator Technology & Engineering Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrtated Elevator Technology & Engineering Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named INTEGRATED ELEVATORS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |