Drawing for TERAQUEST

USPTO serial 75627796

TERAQUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2481266Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 28, 2001
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TERAQUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW G DINOVO

W SCOTT BROWN VINSON & ELKINS LLP2300 FIRST CITY TWR1001 FANNIN STHOUSTON, TX 77002-6760

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services, namely consulting on business organizational management, process management, knowledge management and project managementSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
042computer consulting services, namely computer consulting in the fields of software processes, quality assurance, software and system configuration management, architecture, and software engineeringSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2008C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 5, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 27, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance