USPTO serial 75627864
4D-VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3105410Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2006
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 4D-VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald H. Kiel
GERALD H KIEL REED SMITH LLP599 LEXINGTON AVE 29TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Devices, namely, television screens, computer monitors, projection screens, liquid crystal displays, plasma panel displays, laser based displays, twisted nematic LC, in plane switching LCD ferroelectric liquid crystal displays, field emission devices, polymer based displays, electroluminescent displays for reproducing three dimensional scenes and/or objects in such a way that they are perceived by an observer in a three dimensional manner; devices, namely, television screens, computer monitors, projection screens, liquid crystal displays, plasma panel displays, laser based displays, twisted nematic LC, in plane switching LCD, ferroelectric liquid crystal displays, field emission devices, polymer based displays or electroluminescent displays for displaying on the basis of a plurality of sectional images so as to be perceived in a three dimensional manner; liquid crystal and computer monitors displays for showing moving and still scenes and/or objects in such a way that they are perceived in a three dimensional manner; lens arrays for generating depictions that are perceivable in a three dimensional manner; devices, namely, cameras for recording three dimensional scenes and/or objects in such a way that they are perceived by an observer in a three dimensional manner when displayed on one of the above-mentioned products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Printed products and printed advertising materials, namely, paper banners, paper boards, paper file jackets, paper brochures, all with depictions which are perceived in a three dimensional matter made on the basis of a plurality of sectional images, on the basis of lenticular sheets overlaying and interleaved pictures made up of many views of more than one scene or with barrier techniques | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and development pertaining to the recording and transmission of three-dimensional scenes and/or objects and the reproduction thereof in such a way that they are perceived in a three dimensional manner; computer programming services for the development of software for reproducing originals in such a way that they are perceived in a three dimensional manner | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Grasnick, Armin
- Other trademarks owned by 4-D VISION GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by 4-D VISION GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by 4-D VISION GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named 4D-VISION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |