USPTO serial 75627882
TRIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON, PASTE 401 BROADWAY PL E3433 BROADWAY ST NEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413-3009Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Guide Catheters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 1, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |