USPTO serial 75627912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy H. Hiebert
TIMOTHY H HIEBERT C/O SAMUELS, GAUTHIER & STEVENS LLP225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing financial information, providing information about investment accounts, providing investment management services, and providing retirement fund investment services, all by means of a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |