Drawing for E401K

USPTO serial 75627912

E401K

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E401K?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy H. Hiebert

TIMOTHY H HIEBERT C/O SAMUELS, GAUTHIER & STEVENS LLP225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing financial information, providing information about investment accounts, providing investment management services, and providing retirement fund investment services, all by means of a global computer information networkACTIVEOct 7, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 31, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2000LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Dec 3, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance