Drawing for TRANSKARYOTIC THERAPY

USPTO serial 75627913

TRANSKARYOTIC THERAPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSKARYOTIC THERAPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy H. Hiebert

TIMOTHY H HIEBERT C/O SAMUELS, GAUTHIER & STEVENS LLP225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceuticals and biologics for use in the treatment of genetic disorders, cancer, hematologic disorders, endocrine disorders, reproductive dysfunction, short stature, diabetes, metabolic disorders, disorders of the central nervous system, gastrointestinal disorders, cardiovascular disorders, autoimmune disorders and other disorders of the immune system, infectious diseases and enzyme deficiency diseases; genetically altered cells and cell lines for use in the production of human therapeutic proteins, for medical diagnostic use, for use in the treatment of a variety of diseases and disorders and for implantation into human patientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 6, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 12, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 8, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance